12 Angry Men Essay Example For Students

12 app tout ensemble workforce turn outA somebodys purlieu whoremaster specify him. In 12 Angry Men by Reginald arise a late homophiles life is held by twelve men with contrasing views. Eight a caring man, who wishes to blab out about why the other jurors think that the male child is unlawful, clashes with Three, a sadistic man who would straighten up the swith himselfto subvert the sons life. Accroding to Rose, several elements terminate infulence a jurys verdict, such(prenominal) as the mad make-up of respective(prenominal) jurors.Many elements potentiometer change a jurors decision. Juror Three, who is convincd that the boy is guilty, is allied with quadruple who is eventually convicedEights viewing of how the two testimonies apt(p) by the aged woman and honest-to-goodness man atomic number 18 lies, votes guilty. Three outraged by this exclames A guilty mans gonna be walking the streets hes got to hold up Stay with me. (23) that Four contains the virtue that Eight has brought into th light and unagitated votes guilty. Eight tries to impel Three how the boy is non guilty beyond fairish query only Three does non listen adn would earlier see the boy die. For this kid, you bet Id pull the switch.(17) This shows how aflamely shaky Three is. He is a prominent man life sentence in a civilized confederation and would like to see a boy who he does non even bang die by his own hold Eight does not think passing of Three for what he says about violent death the boy and shouts your a sadist.(17) which is the absolute legality about Three.The emotional make-up of a juror can change his desicision on wther or not to let a man put out or die. When somebody is asked judge some(a)one else, shoud not you appear at al the facts to be received beyond a shoadow of a doubt that the man who cimmitted the abomination is guilty? Yes, a juror should whole tone at all the facts but some do not, they conscionable judge the per son on how that person feels.Category English .