Analyzing a company an dmaking comparisons Research Paper

Analyzing a company an dmaking comparisons - Research Paper ExampleAn outline of activity ratios and positiveness ratios of twain companies i.e. ENERSYS and EXIDE is conducted for time period from 2010-2011. The first ratio calculated is receipts margin, which is pull in Profit/Total Revenue. Net profit margin/Total Revenue is an important measure of favorableness and tells how much a company has earned after it has paid off all its expenses. So ENERSYS profitability is calculated to estimate where ENERSYS currently stands in comparison to its competitors. ENERSYS net profit margin is 6% in 2011 and 4% in 2010. Exides net profit margin is 1% in 2011 and -4% in 2010. Clearly, ENERSYS is trend ahead of Exide in impairment of profitability as ENERSYS earns a profit of 6% in 2011over its revenue earned. This means that ENERSYS gets to keep a profit share of 6% after all its expenses has been paid. On the different hand, Exide earns a net profit of only 1% in 2011, which means t hat Exide gets to keep a profit of only 1% after all its expenses have been paid. So, ENERSYS performs well as it earns more net income then(prenominal) Exide. However, Exide has improved more than ENERSYS since 2010 as Exides profit margin improved from -4% to 1%, charm ENERSYSs profit margin accessiond from 4% to 6% (ENERSYS, 2011). ENERSYS Return on Assets was 6% in 2011, so it earned 6% on its assets which is much give out than Exides ROA of 1%. . SO, clearly in terms of profitability ENERSYS outperforms Exide. Receivables turnover ratio for ENERSYS was 4.05 in 2011 and 3.98 in 2010, magical spell receivables turnover ratio for Exide was 5.35 in 2011 and 5.23 in 2010. ENERSYS Days Sales outstanding was 89 days in 2011 and 92 days in 2010, while Exides days sales outstanding was approximately 68 days in both 2011 and 2010 (Seeking Alpha, 2011).. facial expression at the activity ratios for both Exide and ENERSYS, it is surprising to note that Exide performs well then ENERSYS in its asset use. Exide is better able to collect its revenue money after sales have been made in a few(prenominal) days and so would convert its revenue to cash sooner than ENERSYS. ENERSYSs competitive financial strength is strong in terms of its profitability as it has a high net income in old years as compared to its competitors and higher total assets, and has made a lot of capital investments. However, ENERSYS is weaker in utilization of assets and has to put in stringent policies in order to tackle the issue (Yahoo, 2011a). A careful abstract of turn Cash Flow available to the firm will determine which firm is outperforming the other. Calculating the Free Cash Flow to Firm by adding Cash Flow from Operations to Interest expense and opinionated investments, it is seen that Exide has greater Free Cash Flow to Firm than ENERSYS. ENERSYS free cash flow to firm is $31945000, while Exides Free Cash Flow is $35088000. Also, looking at the cash flow statement of both compani es, ENERSYS has a negative cash flow due to higher investment in capital and higher debt financing. However, despite negative cash flow during 2011(Yahoo, 2011b), ENERSYS still has more cash reserves than Exide. This shows that ENERSYS is making bread and is not holding back as it is buying more capital in order to increase and develop further for the future. ENERSYS fixed capital expenditures entails that it will have a much positive mental capacity in