Reflection on Social Work Group Task

Reflection on hearty draw Group TaskThis essay is going to reflect on learning gained from a radical lying-in carried out in the social unit lectures. I ordain explore crowd make for theories, collaborative and inter-disciplinary operative and the application of these theories in similarity to the group operation. I will similarly identify how I will uprise my utilize in similarity to my current skills and aras for development. Finally, I will similarly reflect on how I have developed my self-awareness, schoolmaster determine and overlord development, in relation to group regulate task and how this will inform my future professional practice.Toseland and Rivas (2008) define group blend in as a goal tell activity aimed at accomplishing tasks. Members of the group have the opportunity to share ideas, feelings, thoughts, beliefs, let in interactions and also share experiences. The group members develop feelings of mutual mutualness and a sense of belonging. Mart in and Rogers (2004) define inter-disciplinary conveys as a aggroup of individuals with antithetical professions, working collaboratively with a shared misgiving of goals, tasks and responsibilities. This collaborative working is fatalityed when the problems are complex, a consensus finality is required and also when different competencies are needed.According to Cheminais (2009), the approach to the collaborative working requires clarity on percentages, power, accountability and strategic planning. This was evident during the group work as the group worked collaboratively to share ideas and tasks were allocated to each member according to competencies and mutual understanding.Salas et al. (2012) call downs that, group work started from the perspective of people working in partnership for a reciprocal goal. The theories of group work by and by materialised in regard to the kinetics of group work and the they provide an understanding of human behaviour when people are work ing in groups. A group or team gage be understood by looking at Tuckman and Jensens (1977) feigning of group set upion which comprise of forming, storming, norming, performing and later adjourning.According to Tuckman and Jensen (1977), the forming set up is when the group members are establishing common interests and get to k at present genius some former(a)wise with the desire to be part of the group. Martin and Rogers (2004) states that, in an inter-disciplinary team this is the fix up where rank is established, team purpose is clarified, roles and boundaries are decided and interpersonal relationships begin.Tuchman and Jensen (1977) state that, storming spirit level may involve competing for ideas and perspectives, rules are developed and members may confront champion a nonher. Conflict may emerge and when unresolved, it burn inhi bite the teams progress. There is then the norming salute when members realise roles and responsibilities and an agenda is established. This stage involves belonging, suppuration and control. The performing stage is when the group is functional and tasks are implemented and evaluated. Finally, the adjourning stage involves the goals and objectives fulfilled and task completed.Tuckman and Jensens (1977) model of group formation tail be applied to different settings and groups and it is easy to use. The model is flexible and hind end be applied regardless of type of group or task. nevertheless the model has no clear demarcation of the stages and is a linear format although the first four stages may not be in sequence. It does not explain time spent in each stage or if the stage can be repeated as some of the stages can recur for example norming and perfoming stages. (Halverson 2008)Reflecting on the unit group task, I theorize my group went through Tuckman and Jensens (1977) model group formation which include the formingstage in which the group purpose was clarified. The group went through the stormimg stage and at that point, there were disagreements on what should be included and how the task will be presented. I was in favour for a presentation apply Power Point, stock-still the majority of the group voted for a role piddle which I thought was not going to address all the learning due to time allocated for the group to present. I was also a bit anxious for failing the task as the group had elected me to gather up the lead on the role play. At that time I felt up that the team wanted me to do most of the task and I spurned the ideas they were putting forward. I stand for I did this unconsciously because I clear my actions later on when my group members gave feedback.Belbins (2010) work identified roles in teams which each offer positive contributions to team working. The roles include co-ordinator, evaluator, maintainer, innovator, shaper, implementer, expert, investigator, team and completer, Reflecting on Belbins (2010) group roles, each team member brought strength and perspe ctives grounded in their discipline and experience. During the group work task, I had the experience and knowledge in relation to the task and I found myself leading the group on sourcing information. I got positive feedback from my group colleagues such(prenominal) as, goal oriented, researched well on the topic, contributed well and very good ideas on the role play, moreover I was criticised of being inflexible with ideas of others.The feedback brought awareness on how I work with others and will protagonist me in my practice. I echo I took the role of an implementer who turns the team concepts into practical actions and plans however, inflexible and somewhat reluctant to change. However reflecting on my experience from my previous placement when I was working on a get a line to enable young mothers to gain independent skills, the project failed because I lost interest as a result of constraint in obtaining the resources. I think at that time I took the role of an investigator .In Belbins (2010) model, an investigator explores opportunities and resources from many sources however can jump from one task to another and lose interest. Looking back at it, I think this was because I tend to do things in a integrated way and task oriented. The resources in the organisations did not allow me to do the task in time and I end up losing interest. I think in future I need to be flexible and think of other ways of working around the plan for the benefit of the portion users. I should also seek supervision with my manager to discuss such situations as it can provide best possible support. I later understood the situation of working in an organisation team by looking at the group system conjecture.According to Connors and Caple (2005), group systems theory provides an understanding of working with teams or groups in an organisation. They suggested that, group systems theory is stoopd by the interactions within the group and by the external environment. All the group members influence group dynamics however, the organisation in which the group work may impacts the group work with its boundaries, resources and leadership structures. I abandoned a project which was going to benefit the young mothers and in a way the residential area as well. Although this was due to organisational constraints, as a future social worker, I should try to balance responsibilities in a way that supports well-informed decision making, using professional judgement and accountability (British Association of neighborly Workers 2012).Salas et a.l (2012) state that, in order for me to be grounded in theories of group work, I need to formulate theoretical frameworks that are in alignment with my perspectives and inclinations. To achieve this I need to have knowledge of the strength and weaknesses of the frameworks I use. This will help me to select theories that are appropriate to the situation.The Health and Care Professions Council (HPCP) (2012) also states that, I shou ld understand the key concepts of the knowledge base relevant to social work so as to achieve change and development.Gilley et al. (2010) suggested that the purpose of a group is to accomplish the task and for the practitioner to develop effective interpersonal skills. As a social work student, in order to work collaboratively, I need to develop skills and knowledge in decision making, effective colloquy and task coordination and the ability to learn from others and embrace change (DAmour et al 2005). This is dictatorial as I will be working in teams with other professionals or agencies.From the unit group work, I have learnt that mutual understanding and collaboration is resilient for teamwork to be effective. Teamwork requires respecting each others values, beliefs and bases and also self awareness of my own beliefs, values and perspectives ( residence hall 2005).I also now have an understanding of the importance of effective communication, participative decision making and p ass judgment ideas of other when working in a team. The group work enabled me to develop skills in sharing of ideas and also how to relay and support my own viewpoint with confidence.According to Crawford (2012), I essential have an understanding of my own professional identity as a social worker so as to develop confidence in myself and work with other professionals effectively.The HCPC (2012) states that, I must be able to engage in inter-professional and inter-agency communication and work in partnership with other agencies as part of a multi-disciplinary team. It is also vital that I develop self awareness of my behaviour and values.According to Hall (2005), as values are internalised, they can be invisible to other team members thereby creating obstacles in inter-professional working. As a result, I must make my professional values clear to other professionals I work with and also have an understanding of their values.The College of Social Work (2014) states that, as a social worker, I need to develop skills, competencies and the ability to recognise the challenges and dynamics of team-working and also have an awareness of team cultures so as to be able to work effectively in a multi-disciplinary team.The group work task and the feedback I received from my colleagues enabled me to develop awareness on how I work with others and I also managed to learn about my strengths and weaknesses. For example fetching the role of an implementer I was able to execute a plan however resistant to change. I have also learnt that I need to have it off and appreciate the differences and adjust, adapt, and mirror interpersonal interactions when interacting with others. In future, I need to take into consideration other peoples ideas as there are different approaches to tasks and also appreciate other peoples experiences and values especially when working with professional of different background as mine.ReferencesThe College of Social Work (2014) Roles and functions of social workers in England http//www.tcsw.org.uk/uploadedfiles/thecollege/_collegelibrary/policy/rolesfunctionsadvicenote.pdfDAmour, D, Ferrada-Videla, M, Rodriguez, L, Beaulieu, M 2005, The conceptual grounding for interprofessional collaboration core concepts and theoretical frameworks,Journal Of Interprofessional Care, 19, pp. 116-131, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, EBSCOhost, viewed 14 awful 2014.http//0-eds.b.ebscohost.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?nobk=yvid=4emailprotectedhid=102Claire B. Halverson, S. Aqeel TirmiziEffective Multicultural Teams Theory and Practice theory and practiceBritish Association of Social Workers (2012) The Code of Ethics for Social Work Statement of Principleshttp//cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_112315-7.pdf